fancypants keyboards

As I read Ars Technica, I came across a post and then a discussion about fancy new keyboards. The following caught my attention and facinated me:

Projection Keyboard

In the future, this will be used on the moon
This little device was the first one to catch my attention. Sadly, they don’t seem to discuss the technology used in its creation. Effectively, it will project a little keyboard onto a flat surface, and as you type on that, it will detect your keystrokes. Yahoo seems to have a better picture of it than the actual site of the producers, who only seem to have artist’s renderings of the device. They do claim to have “resolved technological hurdles” in order to create this device. So we’ll have to wait and see.

Senseboard

Looks comfortable
I’ve seen a couple variations on the Senseboard some are little finger-grabbing rings, etc. Apparently they’re supposed to sniff the ways your hand moves (Senseboard claims to use AI to assist in this process). I wont believe this until I try it. If this worked it could be great because people could type anywhere (no flat surface) with no over-bulky unit. If these things ever shrink along with the rest of technology, maybe we’ll all have them. There’s a thought. If keyboards became so easy to carry around and we all had them, would public phones remove their dirty buttons? Same with Interac machines, or drive-throughs.

Half Keyboard

Looks comfortableFinally, this Sinbad-approved little keyboard brags of simple one handed usability that can be picked up in a handful of minutes. The way it works is you get a left-side of a keyboard, and if you want to use a key on the other side, you hold spacebar and it works like shift. Tapping spacebar will still provide a space. The part I found cool, was that it mirrored the right half of the keyboard. So the P and the Q share a key. I guess the brain finds it easier that way. They have a nice little How It Works section which is worth playing with (they have Flash!). They even have what seems to be a one-hand simulator where you can test your skills with your own keybaord. Try it, it’s fun.

Looks like we’ll have to decide how dependant we are in that ‘tapity-tap’.

 

Long Bets

Wanna bet that by 2025, we will receive intelligent signals from outside our solar system? Put $2,000 where your mouth is and go do it!

Co-founded by Wired’s Kevin Kelly, LongBets.com is a forum for those of us with big ideas and money to burn. For example, inventor/author/futurist Ray Kurzweil has bet Mitchell Kapor, founder of Lotus, $20,000 that “a computer will pass the Turing Test by 2029.

See the open bets and bets on the record for a glimpse into some neat ideas by some interesting people. Betters so far include blog-dude Dave Winer vs. NY Times-dude Martin Nisenholtz and Microsofty Craig Mundie vs. Lord-Google, Eric Schmidt.

 

silverorange v2.0

silverorange
For those interested, silverorange (the web firm where I work) has redesigned their site. Feedback is welcome.

 

Google catalogues

I know it’s unusual for me to make posts about Google or any kind of web thing at all, but I can’t remain silent any longer. I wont attempt to use the word “semantics” because I don’t know what it means (I have since looked it up). With that being said, I will begin.

Maybe a month or so ago, maybe more, I noticed that on Google’s front page they spoke of catalogs.google.com that apparently would let me browse mail-order catalogues they have scanned. I was facinated, and amused. Tease me if you like if you’ve seen Fight Club, but since my girlfriend and I are getting an apartment next year, I went to the Ikea Catalogue and began perusing. It’s really quick, and offers a bunch of different page views. It will never replace the feeling I had at age ten, looking at Lego in the WishBook, but it’s still a fun service.

The ability to do a keyword search was quite interesting, and remarkably accurate considering they’re dealing with tiny-scanned-smudgy magazine font. I did get a few red herrings, but it made leafing more efficient.

Semantics.

 

the many faces of instant messaging

MSN and ICQ emoticons
These are a selection of the ’emoticon’ graphics included in Microsoft’s Windows Messenger, and AOL’s ICQ.

The left column comes from Windows Messenger – included in Windows XP.

The right column is from the latest version ICQ, (perpetual) beta 2002a.

Uncanny.

 

BlogML: The Weblog Markup Language

A simple thought experiment in weblog semantics

1:37 PM – Joe makes a post on his blog about his golf vacation on Prince Edward Island

3:24 PM – Joe makes a post on his blog about hang gliding in Newfoundland

Two weeks pass.

Sam searches Google for hang gliding in Prince Edward Island. Joe’s blog is the first result.

The trouble with this picture is that Joe never wrote anything about hang gliding on Prince Edward Island. The thought never even crossed his mind.

This is a fundamental problem with searching by keywords – the page is not necessarily the finest unit of web content. Often, especially on weblogs, any given page will have dozens of completely independent posts – made by different authors, on different days, about different topics. Google has no way to tell one post from another and can only link to general archive pages rather than to individual posts.

With all the talk about separating design from content and encoding semantics, it occurred to me that this current level of separation isn’t particularly useful to most of us. It can help with accessibility, which is important; but the cruel fact is, that for truly semantic code to become universal, people are going to have to see concrete results (ie. cool stuff happening).

BlogMLBlogML (weblog markup language) doesn’t exist yet (as far as I know), but I think could save us.

The average weblog has a relatively simple set of fields for each post: title, author, date/time, permanent URL, # of replies, URL of replies, and main content (I’m sure I’m missing some, but you get the idea).

If we could somehow code our weblogs with this structure, Google and other services would be able to see the content as it really is: a loose collection of independent posts. When Google indexes weblog archives, search results could include individual blog posts with the appropriate links (rather than linking to an archive page with 30 posts).

This is not a new idea – it’s the semantic web and it’s been coming for a while. Here’s the key: The weblog community is in the unique position situation to affect significant change through nimble and collective action.

Think about it – if some kind of markup could be defined for this, it wouldn’t take years to be adopted (like most standards). Rather, it would take the cooperation of a few key weblog players. If Blogger, Moveable Type, GreyMatter, and the UserLand suite all started pumping out BlogML-enhanced HTML, it would be instant critical mass. The majority of weblogs would be on board in a matter of days and it wouldn’t take long for the rest of us to jump on the bandwagon. Search tools like Google, BlogDex, and DayPop would be able to offer better search results to their customers.

Webloggers are in a unique position to take collective leaps and bounds towards the semantic web.

Ok, so how do you actually do this? What is BlogML? What does it look like? I’m not sure – I’m shooting from the hip here. Perhaps a simple markup could be hidden in HTML comment tags. Or perhaps a set of reserved keyword DIV and SPAN titles could be established (eg. <div id=”BlogMLtitle”>) as this would be an appropriate use of the ID element according the W3C specs.

Implementation can be dealt with. What I want to know first is: Does this make sense? What hasn’t it already been done? Had is already been done? What am I overlooking? I look forward to your feedback.

 

it’s mooglicious!

They remind me of Lego spacemenTo my great wonderful joy, I was pointed in the direction of a cover band called The Moog Cookbook. These Space Rockers cover classic rock songs and some new (circa 1996) pop stuff.

They reduce Green Day’s “Basketcase” to slinky elevator muzak. Some other AOV favorites are Black Hole Sun and Hotel California (which I would like to add features the Popcorn lick at the end).

I totally dig this stuff, the Nirvana cover had me flailing my arms in an attempt to dance. This was only ever previously achieved by Joy Electric‘s Moogy* antics.Does anybody know of any other Moog rock like this?

* I like saying Moog. Moog.

 

robots to persuade humans with human-like voices

AT&T Labs is commercializing their recent advances in text-to-speech processing (a.k.a. talking computers) with Natural Voices. While the live demo still reveals its robotic ancestry, a few of the pre-recorded demos could really pass for human. Listen to one of the better samples (70Kb Windows Media).

It’s a big step from the standard text-to-speech quality available only a few years ago (hear a sample).

And so the anthropomorphization of robots inches forward.

 

Simple for sale.

37signals.com
The web interface specialists at 37signals have turned their experience on themselves and served up at nice redesign of 37signals.com. The old site lives on as the 37signals manifesto (worth reading for any web professional).

With the new site comes a White Paper on Contingency Design (‘design for when things go wrong’) that builds on the examples of contingency design, good and bad, at the previously linked Design Not Found.

The guys at 37signals also maintain a fine blog, Signal vs. Noise.

 

cookies web stats

Please pardon the self-serving post – but I am in need of some stats.

Does anyone know or know where I can find info on the percentage of general web users that have cookies enabled/disabled?

If so, contact me. Thanks.