I write a short post about how we chose the name “silverorange” for our company. We skirted catastrophe.

The best part about Monotype’s updated Helvetica Now font family is that we can stop pretending to know how to say “neue.”

“My friend Peter”, as I refer to him frequently in anecdotes around the house, has posted a few fascinating visualizations of how far people need to travel to vote in the upcoming Prince Edward Island provincial election.

For those not following along with the democratic experiments of Canada’s smallest province, this next election is paired with a referendum on proportional representation. While it is as much advocacy as information, I found this 8-minute explanation of the Mixed-Member Proportional (MMP) electoral system in question to be helpful.

My friend and brother-in-Web-development from silverorange, Nick Burka, has written an article about the new Web Authentication API (WebAuthn) from the W3C. It’s a good article on a cool topic.

My thought process on seeing this article in the Washington Post this morning:

1. Moving away from the death penalty is great.
2. He looks like the evil politician in a political action thriller movie.
3. Do I think everyone with their hair slicked-back is evil?
4. Yes. Yes, I do.

Life is a lot less disappointing if you treat umbrellas as disposable.

I gave a brief presentation internally at silverorange about the ways I’ve been learning to get better at receiving critical feedback. It’s now a blog post: How to receive feedback more better featuring delightful images like this:

“…If you’re the anal one in your house who’s rinsing the yogurt out of the yogurt containers before you throw ’em out, YOU ARE RIGHT. YOU ARE DOING IT RIGHT.”

Roman Mars from Episode 341 – National Sword of the podcast 99% Invisible

On my lovely-but-brisk walk to work this morning, I was listening to episode 346 of the Shop Talk Show, a great podcast about front-end Web development. The smart and delightful hosts, Chris and Dave were discussion how React has become such a dominant force in Web development.

I opened up the WordPress app on my phone. Since it was cold and I had gloves on, I tried something unusual for me. I used the voice-to-text feature to speak this snarky little post into the phone and push it up to this very site. After correcting a new misheard words and capitalization, I used my cold fingers to publish this:

I took a spin in a time machine this morning. I jumped seven years into the future and what I saw was chilling.
Everywhere I looked Web developers were working diligently to remove React as dependency from their Web projects.

Feeling pretty cool about living in a future where you can spout off snarky quips and push them to the Web, I arrived at my desk to find an email from my friend Peter asking what my post was about. Peter is a fellow Web developer, but is smart enough to be immune to tech fads–unless they have to do with geolocation.

Peter’s question made it clear that my snarky quick robot-transcribed blog post was completely lacking in context for most human beings; perhaps even most humans who read this site. So, this post is to answer Peter’s question about what I was talking about.

First, React is a “Javascript library for building user interfaces” from the developers at Facebook. It’s powerful, flexible, and fast, but like any technology, it has its drawbacks and unintended side-effects. I was reminded of how technologies rise and fall in the Web development industry and how, unless they are a fundamental part of the platform, like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, they are inevitably replaced by something better.

Ten years ago, JQuery was the cool kid in the world of front-end Web development. Now, projects celebrate ridding themselves of a dependency on JQuery.

It’s easy to imagine, as I did this morning, a not-too-distant future where React has fallen out of favor, but still lives embedded deep within the walls of many of our websites.

As a Twitter-lurker-but-not-poster, I imagine this is what it’s like to use Twitter every day.

I might start initiating conversations the way the Canada Revenue Agency does in its emails:

“Don’t respond to this, but …”