Bill Gates’ House v2.0

Apparently Bill Gates’ house isn’t big enough. According to News.com:

“…some changes are needed to make it more livable. Gates representatives said the home was designed for a bachelor and the family has found that it ‘isn’t fitting as they expected it to’…”

It’s a classic example of why user testing is always necessary. Imagine, he’s been living in a Beta version all this time.

 

thoughts on search keywords.

First, a confession: I am a web stats junkie. I get some kind of power rush from knowing that people are visiting our website.

The stats I love so much include keywords from popular search engines that have led people to aov. Some make sense, others do not. Some are interesting, others disturbing.
I have posted keywords on aov before. However, here is a a more in-depth sampling of such keywords with my thoughts on each:

  • “Mike Lecky”
    I guess search engines work. We did an interview with Mike.
     
  • “Acts of Volition”
    Again, search engines appear to work.
     
  • “music video women Hiphop rock”
    We have written each of these words independently. However, I don’t think they have ever been used in conjunction.
     
  • “futureshop sucks”
    Yes, I agree.
     
  • “holy shit”
    aov has never included either word (although we do like to use profanity here and there).
     
  • “matt slocum pictures, leigh nash cute, leigh nash MP3 download”
    Matt and Leigh are from Sixpence None the Richer. Read why they don’t suck.
     
  • “napster judgement 2001”
    Napster. It will erase your mind.
     
  • “cute kitten photos”
    This is matt’s fault.
     
  • “something about the moffats”
    Yes, there is something about those boys, isn?t there?
     
  • “Porland”
    It’s sad when search stats point out spelling errors (on a semi-related note, Portland with a ‘t’ is a cool place).
     
  • “what is volition?”
    Don’t ask us. Look it up.
     
  • “I want hug card”
    Don’t we all? Here you go.
     
  • “matthew dorrell”
    He claims not to search the web for himself. I’m sceptical. Prove me wrong. Show yourself!
     
  • “microsoft office monopoly”
    I was never good at monopoly. Microsoft Office is a monopoly. It’s also smarter than I am.
     
  • “I do not know nuthin about the money launderin”
    I’m afraid I do know about money launderin’.
     
  • “lemony snicket”
    Like matt said, “Lemony Snicket – suddenly and inexplicably everywhere”.
     
  • “Sex story grandmother”
    A classic case of looking for love in all the wrong places. However, matt did once use these three words in relatively close proximity.
     
  • “morphine preperation”
    I have never had morphine. Apparently I am the only one in this situation here at aov. See the following posts for more info:

     

  • “the most disturbing movie”
    You asked for it. It’s Babe: Pig in the City.
     
  • “who killed biggie smalls?”
    Record companies have whole departments dedicated to faking celebrity deaths. I though I had already explained this.
     
  • “Bluntside the Awning”
    How do you bluntside the awning?
    Simple: press Down + Down + Grind (8 on the Keypad). Confused? You should be.
    Let me explain.
     
  • “The truth about advertising”
    Searching the web for truth can be very frustrating. However, there is a video called Truth in Advertising that is quite amusing.
 

happy birthday, here’s a Joe Louis

I went to Pat & Willy’s, a local Mexican restaurant to celebrate a birthday (don’t even get me started on the bizarre market for faux-Mexican/Texan motif dining on Prince Edward Island – it boggles my mind).

They have a promotion where you get a free meal on your birthday. The idea, no doubt, is that you’ll bring your friends and they’ll bring their wallets. Fine idea.

They used to include a free piece of cake for dessert. This was a nice little treat. Tonight, one of the guys at my table jokes that you get a free Joe Louis for dessert. We all had a good laugh. Then, at the end of the meal, the waitress came with a plate with one lonely Joe Louis with some whipped cream, chocolate sauce, and a sparkler. When I say Joe Louis, I am talking about the cheap chocolate cake things you buy at the 7-11 (a close relative of the Wagon Wheel, often found in Junior High School brown-bag lunches)

.

Let me be absolutely clear. It was not like a Joe Louis. It was a Joe Louis.

 

eyes for telescopes

Eyes for Telescopes

The gem of the East Coast Music Awards was right under our collective nose (if there can be such a thing) all along.

The Charlottetown band, Eyes for Telescopes is comprised of former members of east-coast super-group strawberry.

They have recently released their first CD called Please Survive and it will make you cry (particularly the track My Boy). You can buy it Back Alley Discs.

More to come on aov about the band and the release.

I’ve been looking for an opportunity to mention that I used to work at a grocery store with the drummer and that old bands of ours played at the same shitholes on occasion, but it just hasn’t come up yet. I’ll let you know.

 

calling all Autonomous Post-Materialists

1. Security-seeking Ascetic 2. Thrill-seeking MaterialistIf you have either a lot of bandwidth or a lot of time, there is a nice amusing feature on cultural demographics called Psycho-Graphics at the CBC’s 120seconds.com (see my earlier comments about the site).

However, as is the evil nature of Flash websites, I can’t provide you a simple link to it! ARGH!* You’ll have to go to the front of the site and look for the feature called “Psycho-Graphics” yourself.


* Flash sites don’t allow you to link to a specific sub-section, only the first page of the site. Totally xTreme!
 

we have no revenue model

Jeffrey Zeldman, for those who don’t know, is the poster boy of independent content development on the web. His site, Zeldman.com, is fine example of an intelligent person writing interesting things. It’s not a navel-gazing blog site (although there are some great ones out there).

Read this great account of a web awards gala where Zeldman’s site is recognized along with a load of dot-com companies (this was a few years back, dot-commies were like Jean Cabot, telling the king that the waters off Newfoundland have so much fish you can almost walk on the water).

The best part is a conversation Zeldman has with a woman:

“What is your company?” says the bolder of the two. “I’ve never heard of it.”

“It’s a personal site,“ I say.

She brightens. “Oh, you mean like dating services?”

“No, I mean there’s no company, it’s just me. It’s entertainment for the Web.”

“Ah. Who supplies your entertainment content?”

“I do. I supply the entertainment content.”

She says, “What is your revenue model?”

I say, “I don’t have one.”

Where are they now? Zeldman is about to publish his book and his website is still a staple of independent content development.