Acts of Volition Radio: Session Eleven

Acts of Volition Radio: Session ElevenThis session of Acts of Volition Radio is a loose collection of story-songs and miscellany. It is punctuated by my reporting on the amusing musical selection of my sun-bathing and boom-box weilding neighbours.

Acts of Volition Radio: Session Eleven (37MB MP3)
Story songs and miscellany. Recorded Sunday, June 27, 2004 by Steven Garrity. Run time: 35min.

Session Eleven Playlist:

  1. Stephen Malkmus – The Hook
  2. Crash Test Dummies – The Superman Song
  3. Crash Test Dummies – The Ballad of Peter Pumpkinhead
  4. Pedro The Lion – Bands With Managers
  5. Sloan – Underwhealmed
  6. Bad Religion – Stranger Than Fiction
  7. MxPx – Play It Loud

For more, see the previous Acts of Volition Radio sessions.

Acts of Volition Radio
Acts of Volition Radio
Acts of Volition Radio: Session Eleven
Loading
/
 

More on the Web as Application Platform

A collection of articles surfacing on weblogs coalesced for me this morning. John Gruber’s article, The Location Field Is the New Command Line, is about the rise of the web as a viable application platform. The article builds on Joel Spolsky’s How Microsoft Lost the API War.

Gruber talks about how the web is successful as an application platform despite is weaknesses. This reminded me of Cory Doctorow’s heavily linked (and deservedly so) talk about the ills of digital “rights” management.

Doctorow discusses how media are successful not because they are better at what the old media was good at, but because they are better in some new and different way:

“New media don’t succeed because they’re like the old media, only better: they succeed because they’re worse than the old media at the stuff the old media is good at, and better at the stuff the old media are bad at.”

He goes on to give some examples:

This is the overweening characteristic of every single successful new medium: it is true to itself. The Luther Bible didn’t succeed on the axes that made a hand-copied monk Bible valuable: they were ugly, they weren’t in Church Latin, they weren’t read aloud by someone who could interpret it for his lay audience, they didn’t represent years of devoted-with-a-capital-D labor by someone who had given his life over to God. The thing that made the Luther Bible a success was its scalability: it was more popular because it was more proliferate: all success factors for a new medium pale beside its profligacy. The most successful organisms on earth are those that reproduce the most: bugs and bacteria, nematodes and virii. Reproduction is the best of all survival strategies.

Piano rolls didn’t sound as good as the music of a skilled pianist: but they *scaled better*. Radio lacked the social elements of live performance, but more people could build a crystal set and get it aimed correctly than could pack into even the largest Vaudeville house. MP3s don’t come with liner notes, they aren’t sold to you by a hipper-than-thou record store clerk who can help you make your choice, bad rips and truncated files abound: I once downloaded a twelve-second copy of “Hey Jude” from the original Napster. Yet MP3 is outcompeting the CD. I don’t know what to do with CDs anymore: I get them, and they’re like the especially garment bag they give you at the fancy suit shop: it’s nice and you feel like a goof for throwing it out, but Christ, how many of these things can you usefully own? I can put ten thousand songs on my laptop, but a comparable pile of discs, with liner notes and so forth — that’s a liability: it’s a piece of my monthly storage-locker costs.

Here are the two most important things to know about computers and the Internet:

  1. A computer is a machine for rearranging bits
  2. The Internet is a machine for moving bits from one place to another very cheaply and quickly

Any new medium that takes hold on the Internet and with computers will embrace these two facts, not regret them. A newspaper press is a machine for spitting out cheap and smeary newsprint at speed: if you try to make it output fine art lithos, you’ll get junk. If you try to make it output newspapers, you’ll get the basis for a free society.

And so it is with the Internet. At the heyday of Napster, record execs used to show up at conferences and tell everyone that Napster was doomed because no one wanted lossily compressed MP3s with no liner notes and truncated files and misspelled metadata.

Today we hear ebook publishers tell each other and anyone who’ll listen that the barrier to ebooks is screen resolution. It’s bollocks, and so is the whole sermonette about how nice a book looks on your bookcase and how nice it smells and how easy it is to slip into the tub. These are obvious and untrue things, like the idea that radio will catch on once they figure out how to sell you hotdogs during the intermission, or that movies will really hit their stride when we can figure out how to bring the actors out for an encore when the film’s run out. Or that what the Protestant Reformation really needs is Luther Bibles with facsimile illumination in the margin and a rent-a-priest to read aloud from your personal Word of God.

So it is with web applications. They don’t succeed because they are better at the things traditional were good at (rich UI, etc.). In some ways, there are much worse than traditional applications. Like MP3 vs. CDs, web applications are better in new and different ways.

Ian Bicking has more in what makes web applications good.

 

Great Band Names that Don’t Exist

I have been in two bands in my sorry rock and roll career (it’s been years since I’ve played in a band, but I still talk about it like I’m Gary Benchley). The bands were named, in order of obscurity and irrelevance, Buddy and Horton’s Choice.

Don’t ask what either name means. Asking what a band name means is the second worst music journalist question ever. For the record, the absolute worst music journalist question is “what kind of music do you play?” Asking a band to classify their music almost guarantees and inane answer. The only good, but unfortunately rare, answer to this is “rock and roll”.

My collegue at Delta Tango Bravo already has a fine post and thread about great band names that exist. So, in the interest of awsome, I thought I would cover the range of great band names that do not (to my knowledge) exist.

Great Band Names that Don’t Exist:

  • Goblin Nob (say it out loud a few times)
  • The Unionized Sherpas (or The Sherpa Union)
  • Attorney’s General
  • Accidental Moguls
  • The Bank Managers
  • The Mongol Hoard
  • The Beatitudes
  • The Rhythm Method

Any of these would look great up on the marquee.

 

The silverorange intranet has been honoured in a Jakob Nielsen report – for the third time

 

What’s wrong with “strategic voting”: Voting As If You Mean It

 

What is it about Weblogs?

I gave a short talk last fall at the Zap Your PRAM conference about how some of the ideas and technology that have made weblogs so successful can be applied elsewhere on the web. However, the talk was cut short due to a tight-schedule (the conference was run by amateurs – including myself). What follows here is the substance of my talk – some of which I had time to share at the conference, some of which I did not.

What is it about weblogs?

What makes a weblog a weblog? Is it the permalinks, the reverse chronological order, the personal voice, syndication? The exact definition of a weblog is an excersize of in semantics that doesn’t particularly interests me. What does interest me, though, is what makes weblogs so engaging and powerful as opposed to standard websites.

First, let us look at some of the key distinguishing features of weblogs when compared to the rest of the web. Note that none involve any kind of real technological breakthrough or innovation. Most a simple adaptations of existing technology.

Weblogs are easy to publish
The process of making a post on a weblog is often as simple as sending an email or creating and saving a word processing file. As simple a change as this is from creating HTML files and getting them to a web server, the results are dramatic. All of the sudden the process of publishing is easy enough that the possible group of users is dramatically larger. Also, the easy of publish affects what, when, and why, we publish – the general result of the ease of publishing being more and more often.
Weblogs have a tendency toward simplicity and consistency in design and structure
Most weblogs are built on popular weblog platforms. Blogger, TypePad, MoveableType, Bloxom, Radio Userland, etc. Each of these tools, and the others like them, all include templates that make it easier to create a simply designed weblog with a structure that follows a whole series of design and usability conventions. Alternatively, if you give 100 people a variety of web development tools and ask them to create a website, you’ll end up with 100 completely different designs and structures – great if you’re into diversity, terrible if you’re trying to find something.
Weblogs have permalinks
Since the ease of publishing weblogs encourages more volume and frequency of publishing, often in small chunks, it is important that these chunks of content be accessible via individual links. On a weblog, the post is the basic unit of content, as opposed to the page. Again, a seemingly simple and subtle feature, the ability to link to each piece of content, affects great influence on the way content is produced, discovered, and read. Permalinks give authors the tools to easily share and interlink content. The resulting community and ecosystem is a great example of how it is best to give simple tools and architecture to people and let them go wild.
Weblogs often allow reader feedback
On many weblogs, if you disagree with the author, you post a reply right there on their own website and let them know. Often, they’ll reply to you in turn. There is usually no registration or signup required – just a simple form asking for little more than your name and your thoughts.
Weblogs are easy to syndicate
While syndication tools available on most weblogs (typically an RSS feed) are seldom used to in the tradition print media definition of syndication, they go a long way to making weblogs easier to follow and read. Where as one could previously keep up with a handful of sporadically updating websites – using an RSS reader to read weblogs takes into account the difficult imposed by their usually irregular publishing schedule.
Weblog tools help share photos
A more recent addition to weblog tools is the ability to easily upload and share photos. Where previously it was difficult to get photos into the appropriate size and format, upload them to a web server, and then create links to them – new weblog tools will do with automatically. While there have been tools to publish photos on the web before, none were as accessible as those already built into a weblog.

When examined individually, none of these distinguishing features of weblogs seem particularly interesting or innovative. Most, or all, of these features have been available through one for or another before. However, when combined, they create an environment where people can connect and communicate easily on a variety of scales.

Living Examples

Each of these attributes of weblogs can also be applied outside of the world of websites. RSS feeds can be used to share all kinds of data. I wrote, last year, about how RSS is used on the Sloan band website to syndicate four different types of data.

Amazon.com, for example, has taken great advantage of allowing reader / user feedback (mostly in the form of book / product reviews). Of course, Amazon.com has a “permalink“ for each book – as each book lives on its own page. However, Amazon.com does not offer “permalinks” for reader reviews, which limits the ability of external authors (like webloggers) to interact with the world of Amazon reviews.

I find these basic attributes of weblogs are helpful to keep in mind when developing other website and web systems. This doesn’t mean you should stick an RSS feed on every site you build. Rather, it is helpful to keep an eye out for parallels between the world of weblogs and your project and draw on your experience as a weblog reader and writer.

 

I’ll be at the FreeDesktop.org’s Desktop Developers’ Conference in Ottawa July 19-20 – let me know if you’ll be there

 

Canadian Federal Leadership Debate, sans-Green

The 2004 Canadian Federal Leadership Debate

Given the petty squabling and childish interuptions I’m seeing on the Canadian federal leadership debate, maybe it’s in his best interest that the leader of the Green Party was excluded from the debate.

I’m guessing there was a language issue when Gilles Duceppe said of Canada / US relations: “Being a friend doesn’t mean you’re kneeling in front of them.” That said – he presents himself as the most reasonable and rational candidate.

 

Firefox 0.9 is out and better than ever – Joel On Software likes it

 

Best mirror photo ever, by my friend Geoff