Matt Round writes on his weblog about how strange it is that many wedding photographers retain ownership of negatives (or high-res originals, in the case of digital photography) and charge clients for additional prints. Indeed.
The photographer who’ll be documenting my upcoming nuptials includes all negatives in his general fee.
Oh, and is it just me, or does “nuptials” sound like a dirty word?
If you had asked me, before Firefox came along, if tabs were a good idea for a web-browser, I would have said no, absolutely not. The old Mozilla Browser had them, and Opera had them. Both were clunky and intrusive.
The real reason I would have thought it was a bad idea, though, is that tabs introduce a whole new metaphor to desktop document management. We already have windows – adding tabs inside windows just messes everything up. You can’t use existing operating system window management techniques to switch between tabs, such as Alt+Tab or the window-list taskbar. Why should some documents be in tabs and in a window, while others are each in their own window. It would be anarchy!
Yes, all of the above criticisms of tabs are true, but it doesn’t matter. Regardless of broken and mixed metaphors, after about two years of using Firefox (and the betas that led up to it), I use tabbed-browsing extensively.
Having used them for a while now, I have some thoughts one why tabs do work well for web browsing:
One of the big disadvantages of tabs compared to windows is that you can never see the contents of two tabs simultaneously. With windows, you can arrange two windows side-by-side, or only partially overlapping. While this is useful in some cases (visual comparing two documents, typing in one windows while using another for reference, etc.), it is not often needed when browsing the web. You just don’t often need to see two web pages side-by-side, and in the few cases where you do, you still can (using windows).
It’s a good thing I wasn’t in charge of the user interface design for Firefox, because I was completely wrong. This is a good reminder that you cannot rely solely on your own intuition when designing software that people interact with.
Robert McNamara has published a remarkable and startling essay on the state of nuclear arms in the US
We don’t often think of Windows 95 as a shining example of user interface design and usability. It was slow on the hardware of the day, it crashed often, and many of its claimed “innovations” were copied from Apple and others.
All of that said, Windows 95 was a big leap for visual user-interfaces at the time. Even if it didn’t break new ground in design, it was significant if only because it brought many of the visual user-interface design innovations of the previous decade to a massive audience.
I was a huge geek/dork, still in high-school, at the time of Microsoft’s development Windows 95. I was one of thousands who paid $49.95 to order a special preview of Windows 95, which was still code-named “Chicago” at the time. Yes, that’s right, I paid for a beta. I can still remember, it came on 37 floppy disks (seriously).
Both Microsoft and their Windows product-line are often considered lumbering behemoths, often with justification. It is surprising to learn that the design process at Microsoft that led to such interface staples as the Start Menu and the window-list task-bar grew out of a small team (approximately twelve people, with another twelve programmers for implementing designs).
The Windows 95 user interface design team used an iterative design process where they would come up with an idea, build a quick/rough implementation, and try it out on users. Then, based on how people fared using the design, they would try again. Rinse, lather, repeat.
This process proved that basic design intuition is often wrong:
“Our first design idea for making window management easier was not very ambitious, but we weren’t sure how much work was needed to solve the problem. The first design was to change the look of minimized windows from icons to “plates”. (See Figure 6.) We hoped that the problem would be solved by giving minimized windows a distinctive look and by making them larger. We were wrong!”
All of this comes from a case study on the interface design of Windows 95. The phrase “We were wrong!” shows up several times in the document. The case study is a fascinating look into what went on, for better or for worse, to be one of the most widespread user interfaces in the history of computing.
Thanks to David Feldman for his article on file browsing in Linux that pointed out this Microsoft case study.
The Science of the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy on CBC Radio science program, Quirks & Quarks (audio available in MP3 and Ogg)
Mike Doughty gets his audience to hold up their cell phones at a concert – cool photo
Good audio interview with Bruce Schneier, author of Beyond Fear about the absurdity of “homeland security”
At the web development firm where I work, we have done work for people who have weblogs before (we’re doing some right now, actually). However, none of our core, long-term, clients have maintained weblogs. That is starting to change.
When you realize your professional clients read your personal weblog, it can be a bit disconcerting (see killing independent George). I like to think that I am the same person, regardless of what sphere of my life I’m in (family, work, friends, etc.) but it still takes a better person than I to be truly “yourself” in all such aspects of life.
Such was the case over the last year, when one of our favourite clients, the good people at the Horton Brasses company in Cromwell, Connecticut started reading some of our weblogs. At first, it felt a bit weird. Even though I know it’s all publicly accessible, I still do a lot of talking out of my ass on this site – stuff I wouldn’t say directly to my mom, or my clients. After a while, though, we got used to it, and now I really enjoy getting feedback on a personal weblog post from a client.
Now, Barb and Toby Rockwell, and their son Orion, from the Horton Brasses company have started a weblog of their own: the Horton Brasses Weblog.
Why read a weblog about an authentic reproduction cabinet and furniture hardware company? You’d be surprised – their lives are far more interesting than my own.
For example, Barb and Toby recently returned from a six-week trip to Vietnam. The travel diary of the trip you’ll find in the Travel category of their weblog is fascinating. The’ve also posted loads of photos from their Vietnam trip in their photo gallery.
They’re also writing about company news and some of the great projects their customers are producing.
The 20th session of Acts of Volition Radio is a collection of hard rock and punk songs. This session runs a bit longer and rocks a bit harder than previous sessions. It may rock your ass off.
Session Twenty Playlist:
For more, see the previous Acts of Volition Radio sessions.
Canadian cell phone providers have agreed to number portability – cool
