This coming Halloween will be my first living in a trick-or-treat accessible building. I’m new in the neighbourhood and I want to impress the local kids (do kids still get impressed these days?).

When I was growing up, there was a house in our neighbourhood that gave out cans of pop and full-size chocolate bars. At the time I thought they must have been eccentric millionaires to display such reckless generosity. I would like children to think that I am a reckless and eccentric millionaire.

As a former Adbusters subscriber, I’m always wary of the commercialization of holidays. I’m not going to go into a rant about the “true meaning of Halloween” (though I can imagine such a rant being quite entertaining). Trick-or-treating is a cool idea. I love that I live in a part of the world where it is considered safe enough to send children door-to-door asking for candy from strangers. I want to do my part.

The trouble I’m having is that I don’t really want to encourage the nutritionally and environmentally unhealthy practice of gorging on individually packaged sugar products. At the same time, I don’t want to be a huge party pooper (perhaps I’m too late for that). I don’t want to be the hippie looser that gives kids apples and granola. Any ideas?

I would appreciate constructive suggestions on what I should give out to kids on Halloween? Unhelpful but amusing suggestions will also be entertained. Keep in mind:

• I’m quite busy and lazy (these are not mutually exclusive conditions).
• I only have 4 days.

Friends and family should consider this a warning: you’re all getting songs and hugs for Christmas.

After an interesting four months, I’m going to close off the Northern Exposure DVD petition at 1000 signatures. This should only take another day or two – so sign up now. After I close the petition, I’ll post an overview of what happened and what will become of it.

Mammoth consulting firm KPMG has changed their name to BearingPoint. They are trying to dodge the accounting scandal stigma by separating their consulting from their auditing components.

Enjoy a few highlights from a corporate video on the re-branding:

“We make things happen. We don’t bring problems, we bring results.”
“We integrate and collaborate.”
“We deliver on our promises with an attitude of ‘whatever it takes’.”
“We have a presence – an intensity.”
“We know how to think on our feet and we know how to make it happen – now.”
“We don’t walk – we run.”

You just can’t make stuff like that up (well, eNormicom can).

This is obviously reminiscent of Andersen Consulting’s name change to Accenture (“Innovation Delivered”). Apparently Andersen was forced to change their name due to a court ruling. They too have embarrassing corporate videos on their site highlighting their “Brandstorming Initiative” (again, you just can’t make this stuff up).

Maybe Acts of Volition should rebrand and reposition our stragetic role the blogspace. Any ideas? Let’s brandstorm!

Search Google for “MSSQL” and it will ask you:

“Did you mean: MYSQL“

See a screenshot.

About two years ago, I wrote about how Wired Magazine was so heavy with advertising. I thought I would update the stats and compare the November 2000 issue with the current, October 2002 issue.

The more interesting result of the comparison is not the ratio of ads to editorial content (which changed only slightly in favour of editorial in the 2002 issue), but rather the total number of pages. The October 2002 issue is less than half the size of the November 2000 issue.

At the time I thought I was making some clever observation about the commercial nature of the publication. However, while revisiting the stats, it occurred to me that the ratio of advertising to editorial content doesn’t really have any bearing on the quality of the content. You could have 20 pages of great editorial content bundled in with 500 pages of ads, and it would make the editorial content any less valuable (would it?).

The distinction between hardware and software is artificial. The difference between the two is only one of scale: hardware works in the world of matter, software works in the world of energy¹. However, whether you’re manipulating atoms, or electrons, you’re still just using the ‘rearranging of the physical’ as a tool (whether it be a hammer, or accounting software).

This is why it is possible for software and hardware to interact. This is why, when you press a mechanical key on your keyboard, a ‘virtual’ character can appear on the screen. This is why when a ‘virtual’ trigger is sprung, a physical activity can be initiated (when a conditional statement is true, the gears in your printer will turn).

Hardware and software are not two separate worlds. Rather, they are more like the ocean and the atmosphere of Earth: two varieties of the same concept. In practical terms, we think of the ocean as full of something, but of the atmosphere as empty. Really, we are just swimming in an ocean of air. The ocean and atmosphere are both fluids; one of water, one of air. So too is it with hardware and software, one of molecules, and one of electrons. Software is a machine.

If we can accept this premise, that there is really no clear distinction between hardware and software (other than a definitional distinction, much like the atmosphere and ocean), then we can extend the premise to ourselves. Human beings consist of hardware (our bodies) and software (our minds). Depending on your belief system, the soul may be part of the software layer, or may transcend both. However, this is beyond the scope of this article. Just like hardware and software are two ends of the same spectrum, so top are the human mind and the physical body.

If you write the alphabet in sand with a stick, all you have done is rearrange particles of sand. I’m not sure where to go with this. Perhaps this is just circular logic, a stating of the obvious (everything in the universe is just part of the universe – hardly groundbreaking). I’m clearly not breaking any new ground here. However, I think I have finally reconciled for myself, at least in theoretical terms if not in practical terms, what had always struck me as an incongruity: how software and hardware can interact – how moving a mouse can make a cursor move.

Somebody, please tell me they know what I’m talking about.

This is old news, but I’ve been looking for video of this ever since I heard about it a few months ago: Asimo, Honda’s “humanoid robot” playing soccer (it’s the first video on the page – or download the RealVideo file). It is enormously entertaining.

It’s a bit creepy, yes, but the copyright-free musak version of Walkin’ on Sunshine sure helps lighten the mood. This is totally worth watching. At about 3:50 into the clip, the robot “raises the roof”. Don’t miss it.

Oh, and next time a robot rings the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange, can somebody tell me!