hard drive icons: now and then
Behold a visual history of Hard Drive icons in the parallel worlds of Windows and Mac. Notice how they get more and more realistic without becoming more meaningful. Personally I prefer the balance between abstraction and a tactile feel found in the Win9x/W2k and MacOS 9 versions.
The old Mac (v6 and before, I think) icon is pretty impressive and to someone who hasn't opened up their computer, just as meaningful as any of the other icons.
Photorealism is the dumbest idea of all. So that's what a hard drive looks like.
UPDATE:
Here's the equivalent chart of folder icons. Very similar parallels, problems, and progression to the hard drive icons.
that said, i still stand by my spider-sense that the new os is a big step forward... even if it moves a little to the right.
Sandy, Suzan Kare is amazing. For those that aren't familiar with her, check out her portfolio.
I thought the parallel development between the Mac and Windows was interesting too (yeah, yeah, I know, microsoft steals).
Cool little feature, Steve. Now where's the hard drive icon for the Xerox PARC OS that "inpspired" the MacOS?
Dave: is there any OS X interest at the store?
Steve, we all know you're a Maccie wannabe...
If you're craving more OS shots, check out the Graphical User Interface Gallery.
Those of you running OSX may find the NeXT screenshots of particular interest.
The Register: Windows XP hits where Apple's Aqua misses?
As cool as the OS X interface looks - it seems to me its all eye candy. The dock has serious usability problems. That being said it looks beutiful.
WinXP, is jarring at first, and has a lot of eye candy as well, but for the ordinary user, has been greatly simplified - and i think in a very good way. The new start menu is great, i rarely have to even naviage through it anymore, my favourite programs actually bubble up, and it works well.
It might only be an incremental improvment on older versions, but josh darn it, every windows release learns from the last - and gets so much better. Something apple seems to have trouble doing (no multitasking till X, no memory management, etc)
All that said, i'd love to have an OS with built in pdf, and opengl rendering engines - but hey, what use are they really - beyond geek cool?
OS X has the ability to become a great OS - i just think it needs a couple of generations of development to get there.
Isaac, built-in PDF rendering has the potential to greatly simplify print production. OpenGL I don't know shit about. It makes Quake pretty, I guess.
On the login panel, press Control-Option-Del.
An alert panel will pop up with "This is not DOS".
Fucking apple.
Apple still sucks
at the shop i'm finding mostly blank stares when i bring up osX. second in line is the look of panic and fear from os 9 and waaaaaay earlier users. they don't want or feel the need to change. finally there are the hardcore cats that were running the beta version all winter and are keen as hell. these aren't people who run application for entertainment they mess with their computer for entertainment.
i think the cutesy stuff on the "front line" of the interface is there for the civilians. i mention pre-emptive multitasking, protected memory, unix core...nothing. i do the genii-effect , the magnifiey dock icons and it's Aaaaaaaaah! i dunno.
i'm spending a lot of time thinking about the people whose job it is to work on/dream up interface stuff and thinkin' what a cool /tough job that would be.
if anyone ask you what the NEXT interface should be what would you say....Steve G?
There are some nice (subtle) interface improvements I've seen in Windows 2000 (and extended in XP).
Also, check out the The Anti-Mac Interface by Don Gentner and Jakob Nielsen.
let me know or if you have it could u email me at highintheboat@hotmail.com as i been trying to find it but just can't seem 2 find it anywhere on the net. i had it, at 1 time but my hd took a dump on me & i lost it & i thought it was kinda neat icon sry im running xp pro & i still like this icon lol on my desktop.
