Lazy Journalism on Buy Nothing Day
When “news” becomes a product delivered on a regular schedule, press releases and made-for-news events must become pretty attractive to journalists.
Today, most major American news websites are running something along the lines of “Lots of People Go Shopping” as their leading story.
CNN screenshot #1 |
CNN screenshot #2 |
MSNBC screenshot |
|---|
The CNN front-page story blurb reads:
Early bargain hunters packed stores across the nation this morning, but industry watchers say it remains to be seen if the buying momentum will hold going into the weekend. The day after Thanksgiving is one of the most important shopping days for U.S. retailers.
Is this news? Who decides to run a story like this? I understand that holiday shopping is a powerful economic driver in the U.S., but this is so hollow a “story” it feels like a vacation for journalists.
Note, as always, the “More News” stories on right side of the CNN.com screenshot are so absurd as to be hilarious. All of this on Buy Nothing Day.
I'll abstain from cruel jokes like suggesting Fox of GNN.tv :-)
http://www.reuters.com/ is also pretty good... sort of a "news mothership", if you will.
To me, it seems disingenuous to celebrate holiday shopping just because it helps the shop workers. After all, how much do they really profit? And aren't they also the ones buying so much?
It seems that the only ones coming out ahead in January are the shop owners and the producers of all the crap people are buying. :)
Joel: Onward and upward. Except the workers are also the consumers and eventually it falls apart when all time is taken by work and consuming. In other words, "more sales" can not possibly be better to infinity. There's a point somewhere that quality of life begins to decline.
nathan: nothing is better taken to infinity, to drink water is essential for survival, drink too much and you'll drown.
Stephen: just knowing that something is going well is not news -- things that happen on a regular and predictable basis have no news value (i.e. these stories lack impact, conflict, and uniqueness). Thus, BND is news because of the conflict and potential impact inherent in the story; "stores sell lots of shit" is not news, because the same thing happens every year. The argument that people need to know because they have to put bread on the table doesn't work -- if you work in a store you *know* how well you did on any given day and whether you can keep putting bread on the table (you don't have to turn to 6 o'clock news to find out).
> driver in the U.S., but...
I think that you're downplaying this just a bit. Given the state of the US economy over the last few years, I don't think the first indications of holiday season performance is all that "hollow" a story.
While it's true that a lot of journalists cover it as more a human interest story, there are very real ramifications here for US retailers, employees, and - in the longer term - the economy and country as a whole. Thus, this is of interest to me and all sorts of other people.
I agree that it was probably a poor decision to put this item above some of the others listed under "In Other News", and I do agree that journalists tend to be pretty lazy a lot of the time ... But I still think this sort of story has significant relevance and news-worthiness.
In that case, can I have your word that I won't hear anything about the next presidential election in the USA.
But this is exactly what happened on Nov 26 -- none of the stories had any depth aside from stating that "people rush to shop." Consequently, none of the stories had news value either.
All of you!
And the wise man mutters beneath his breath
...You're already dead....
What do you really need? Who is it benefitting? Is what you're buying really benefitting you and the individual (haha) selling it? Is it benefitting some CEO f*ck with a fat thumb?
When I shop, I buy things from an individual. I buy shoes that last. Not shoes that are supposed to change me into the model portraying them.
It is to ring a heavy blow to coporitization. To reinstate capitalism. (Yes, corportization is a threat to capitalism.)
